Fuel-reduction and restoration treatments (“treatments”) are conducted extensively in dry and historically frequent-fire forests of interior western North America (“dry forests”) to reduce potential for uncharacteristically severe wildfire. However, limited understanding of treatment longevity and long-term treatment effects creates potential for inefficient treatment maintenance and inaccurate forecasting of wildfire behavior. In this perspectives paper, we briefly summarize current understanding of long-term effects of three common treatment types (burn-only, thin-only, and thin-plus-burn) in dry forests. We then propose six opportunities for future research: evaluate treatment longevity in the context of management goals and long-term treatment effects, reference departure from un-treated conditions and progress toward desired conditions, account for natural variance of dry forests and associated statistical challenges, explore within-treatment drivers of long-term responses, increase the frequency of post-treatment sampling, and incorporate spatial heterogeneity into long-term analyses. Integrating these opportunities into long-term treatment studies and adaptive management plans can improve treatment maintenance efficiency and wildfire modelling. Ultimately, improved understanding about long-term effects of treatment and treatment longevity can support climate-adaptive management that increases dry-forest resilience to wildfire.
Don C. Radcliffe, Jonathan D. Bakker, Derek J. Churchill, Robert Van Pelt, Brian J. Harvey, Perspectives: Six opportunities to improve understanding of fuel treatment longevity in historically frequent-fire forests, Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 592, 2025, 122761, ISSN 0378-1127.